Reza Zarrab Reveals a Plot to Kill Him, and Is Accused of Rape
“Do you still have any of those things?” a prosecutor, Sidhardha Kamaraju, requested him.
“No, sir,” Mr. Zarrab replied.
He mentioned that whereas he was testifying in New York, his belongings had been seized by the Turkish authorities. Mr. Zarrab made it clear that he believed the Turkish motion had been in retaliation for his cooperating with United States prosecutors.
But a protection lawyer, Cathy Fleming, tried to put a completely different spin on Mr. Zarrab’s testimony throughout cross-examination. Ms. Fleming identified that beneath his plea cut price to grow to be a cooperating witness, he had already agreed to forfeit all of the proceeds of his crimes.
“Correct?” she mentioned.
“Yes, ma’am,” Mr. Zarrab replied.
Lashing Out in Turkey
The trial has riveted Turkey, and its president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has charged that the case is a fabrication.
Perhaps as a result of the case might fire up political hassle for Mr. Erdogan and his former ministers, the president lashed out on Tuesday in a heated assault towards the United States in a assembly in Ankara with legislators from his governing get together.
For 30 minutes he criticized not simply the trial but additionally American assist for Kurdish insurgents in Syria and the United States’ coverage in Israel.
“It is an international coup attempt,” Mr. Erdogan mentioned. “We won’t watch our hands being tied by those who attempt to crucify us in America with the claim that we violated the sanctions.”
At a social occasion final Sunday within the coastal metropolis of Izmir, Turkey, a former prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, who was international minister on the time of Mr. Zarrab’s gold-for-oil commerce scheme with Iran, defended Turkey’s determination to disregard American sanctions towards Iran.
“We did not abide by the U.S.A.’s one-sided embargo, and we will not,” he mentioned. “We said it then, we say it now, and we will say it until Judgment Day.”
“Iran is our neighbor,” he continued. “It is a part of our honor to defend our sovereignty and independence.”
Mr. Zarrab’s revelations, and the sheer scale of the bribery, have given ammunition to Mr. Erdogan’s political opponents. Mr. Zarrab testified that he had paid tens of hundreds of thousands of in bribes to Zafer Caglayan, who was the nation’s financial system minister on the time of the scheme.
A outstanding opposition chief, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, who heads the Republican People’s Party, unveiled a leaked report by the Turkish intelligence service on a 2013 investigation that warned that the scandal might harm the federal government and relations with the United States.
“All the skulduggery was explained,” Mr. Kilicdaroglu informed a ladies’s gathering in Ankara. “Zarrab transfers money,” he learn from the doc, “it may cause a problem in Turkey-U.S. relations.”
If Mr. Zarrab’s ties to Mr. Caglayan are revealed, he continued, “it may become a liability for the government.”
“I am telling this to Erdogan,” Mr. Kilicdaroglu railed. “The fraud, the bribes to your ministers was put in front of you. What did you do? You closed the file. You turned a blind eye to the scam.”
A Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Perhaps essentially the most uncommon growth this previous week involving Mr. Zarrab occurred when he was sued by an inmate in a federal jail in Manhattan who accused him of rape.
The inmate says within the lawsuit that Mr. Zarrab had sexually abused him over a number of months in late 2016 and early 2017, whereas they have been cellmates.
Robert J. Anello, a lawyer for Mr. Zarrab, known as the lawsuit’s allegations “outrageous and false.”
The go well with was filed late on Wednesday and reported on-line by The New York Times on Thursday. It raised the query about whether or not attorneys for the Turkish banker on trial, Mehmet Hakan Atilla, would search to cross-examine Mr. Zarrab in regards to the rape accusation in an try to undermine his credibility.
A courtroom transcript reveals the attorneys, prosecutors and choose had sidebar discussions out of the jury’s earshot after the article was revealed.
A prosecutor mentioned the lawsuit was “nothing but allegations.”
Judge Richard M. Berman mentioned he had not learn the Times article. “I don’t know what it’s about,” he mentioned. “It sounds to me like Page Six stuff.”
Ultimately, the protection didn’t increase the lawsuit earlier than the jury.
Continue studying the primary story