Are tech companies unfairly a scapegoat in terrorism battle?

gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw== - Are tech companies unfairly a scapegoat in terrorism battle?
With conventional areas of insurance coverage, brokers and insurers look to mitigate the issue. If it is flood insurance coverage, for instance, brokers will counsel measures corresponding to sandbags exterior the house and different flood defences; if it’s automotive insurance coverage there are telematics programmes that reward motorists for enhancing their driving. But what about terrorism insurance coverage?

Terrorism insurance coverage has been entrance and centre for a lot of companies this 12 months on the again of a collection of horrific assaults. Many, together with UK Prime Minister Theresa May, have pointed fingers at social media and tech companies as being liable for serving to stamp out that root trigger. But is that actually honest? Do they need to have their fame underneath the highlight?

It appears that social media and tech companies haven’t essentially turned a chilly shoulder to the function they will play in combating terrorism. As Bloomberg reported, such companies have been doing their half – from suspending accounts to eradicating troublesome content material.

To illustrate, right here’s a rundown:

  • Twitter, which screens for terrorist content material by way of its elevated use of synthetic intelligence, reviews  suspending 95% of accounts inside hours, in addition to eradicating 99% of posts.
  • Facebook not solely removes accounts and posts, but in addition notifies authorities when crucial. It beforehand revealed hiring plans particularly for content material screening.
  • Google-owned YouTube claims having eliminated terrorist content material even earlier than anybody is ready to view it. According to the video sharing platform, such is the case for a good proportion of removals, because of its algorithms.

As for the UK Government’s efforts, the report cited a seeming shortfall. For occasion, the attacker who induced the dying of greater than 20 individuals in a Manchester live performance earlier this 12 months was not beforehand contacted by the UK’s anti-terror programme Prevent – even after being flagged to authorities a number of instances.

Instead, the UK Government has centered its consideration to the abovementioned companies and their friends, proposing a stringent two-hour timeframe for eradicating terrorist content material – and a penalty system to associate with it – complying with which, in response to the companies, could be difficult.

Related tales:
Las Vegas assault prompts surge in terror insurance coverage for concert events
MI5 head notes UK terror menace at unprecedented scale

You might also like More from author

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.